Discover the secrets of pottery


hydrobat.com keyword stats



Most current MSN search phrases:

glazing red clay Old Tyme Pottery
modern greek pottery stores  

Why I Am A Communist

RightsWhenever any moral, ethical, political,striking till they get to eight hours."
or even economic question comes up, there is["Eight Hours Must Come," by Robert Green
often a question of rights involved. "DoesIngersoll.] Adam Smith noted that in China,
the woman have the 'right' to abort herthe condition of the worker is so degraded,
fetus?" or "Does a man have the 'right' tothat families are forced to live in boats,
kiss women he is not involved with?" or "Doand would welcome a stinking, putrid piece of
corporations have the 'right' to avoid payingmeat as a godsend. He also noted that the
livable wages?" Whatever it comes down to,wealth is so concentrated in the hands of the
there is always the question of rights. Infew, that families have to drown their infant
Capitalism, there is one distinguishingchildren in water, because they cannot feed
right: the right to private property. Inthem. ["Wealth of Nations," by Adam Smith,
this system, a person can offer theirchapter 8.] Thomas Malthus also noticed
property for sale at ANY price, can offer ANYthis, "the custom of exposing children,
price for the property they want. It doesn'twhich, in times of distress, is probably more
mean that someone will buy it, or thatfrequent than is ever acknowledged to
someone will accept their offer. They simplyEuropeans. Relative to this barbarous
have this one right: to set any price for thepractice, it is difficult to avoid remarking,
property they are selling, or to offer anythat there cannot be a stronger proof of the
price for the property they wish to acquire.distresses that have been felt by mankind for
That is the basic premise ofwant of food, than the existence of a custom
Capitalism.Communism, or Socialism, (at leastthat thus violates the most natural principle
the type that I am promoting) would curtailof the human heart." ["An Essay on the
this economic right. What are thePrinciple of Population," by Thomas Malthus,
justifications or reasons for it? Well,Chapter 4.]Even today, the condition of the
there are two that I shall further elaborateworkers is horrid. Workers are paid between
upon... First, I believe that Communism is4% and 20% of the wealth they produce, with
more capable of elevating a person's status.an exception in the Lodging industry (being
Second, I believe that Communism grants acloser to 37%). [U.S. Census Bureau, 1997
right that Capitalism does not (that is, theEconomic Census, Comparative Statistics, Core
right to the wealth of your own labor).Business Stastitics Series, EC97X-C52, issued
Whether these reasons are justified, I willJune 2000.] This translates to this... If a
try to demonstrate in a concise, powerfulperson operates machinery for a Capitalist,
manner, in the following paragraphs....Theand produce enough products to make his
Ancestral Roots of Civilization and theemployer $100,000, the worker -- that is, to
Evolution of RightsWhen looking at societysay, the person who built the machinery, who
today, at the big factories and the variousoperated it, and then sold it -- would
outlet stores, and seeing all that has comereceive perhaps $15,000. But, this is given
technologically, it can only fascinate thethe best case scenario.There are many more
human imagination. I admit to looking atreasons to believe that this number is closer
these wonders in awe. But, any personto $6,000 or $4,000. For instance, if a
interested in society will have certainminer was REALLY paid 12% of the wealth they
inquiries. Where did civilization comemade, they would be making $40,820 per year.
from?The Roman Empire is sometimes regardedNow, it doesn't take much understanding of
as the starting point of Westerneconomics to see that factory workers do not
Civilization, having its own roots in somemake this much per year. We must understand
Greek culture (borrowing religion andthat CEOs are paid greatly, yet what they are
philosophy). Here, the word "Proletariat"paid by the company is also counted as pay
was first used, describing a soldier who wentroll. Robert M. Delvin, for example, is
to a far off land, captured slaves, and thenChairman, President, and CEO of American
returned home, to find that he could not findGeneral Corporation. He is an employee, but
employment, due to the abundance of slaves.in one year, he made over forty five million
The word "Proletariat" would later be used bydollars. [Source: The Houston Chronicle.]
Marxists, to describe workers who had noWhen his payroll is averaged in to all the
property and could only sell their labor.other workers, then the 12% of all the wealth
The number of slaves that were in Rome duringmade by the workers means that the median
its rise cannot be known for certain, for noaverage of each worker is about forty
official records were kept of slaves broughtthousand. If Delvin worked for the retail
in to the city. But, modern historians seemtrade industry, then that would mean that for
content with the idea that 1/3rd of thehis wage, there are 14,900 full time workers
population was enslaved -- 300,000 to 350,000that are being paid $5.15 per hour. Most
out of 900,000 to 1,000,000 people. When theworkers typically receive the minimum wage,
Roman Empire fell, a new political andmeaning they make $10,712 per year. Now, a
economic system took place known asminer for the mining industry produces a
Feudalism.Feudalism entailed different rightsgreat deal of wealth compared to what he is
and privileges. The land was divided intopaid. A miner makes, on average, makes
fiefs and a vassal was in charge of his$400,000 for his employer, but he is paid
parcel of land. Serfs were the peasants whoonly $10,000 per year. In this case, the
labored for the wealth of their vassal. Aworker receives 2.5% of the wealth in which
serf was not allowed to leave his landhe produces. If a farmer ploughed the field
without proper permission to do so.of 200 crops, the Capitalist would turn
Feudalism developed from post-Roman estatesaround and give him 5 of them. How is it
filled with many slaves. Today, though, mostthat the Capitalist can do this? Simple.
liberal historians will refer to serfs asBecause he owns the farm, he owns the
"just a differnt type of slave," and this istractor, he owns the tools, he owns the land.
quite true.However, the bondage of FeudalismAnd by what right can this be done? By what
could not last forever. A new way of workingdoctrine? The right to property.Thus, what
and producing came into effect. And it came,do we find? We find two great,
as we have today, the industrial society.incontrovertible facts: (1) The laborers,
Various revolutions of the European nationsthe workers, are the producers of wealth.
took place, even as late as the middle 1800'sWithout them, there would be no food, there
(such as the case of Germany). Eventually,would be no iron ore, there would be no
Feudalism was eliminated, the serf wastools. Without them, there would not be the
liberated, and freedom reigned. Thefarms to grow the food, the mines to mine the
crystaline dove of prosperity was on theore, and the factories to produce the tools.
land, and there was never again to be a cryThey are the sole creators of wealth. (2)
of brutality... or, at least, that is theThe condition of those who create all the
picture painted by many historians.The rightswealth is in such a horrid state. They are
of slaves in the Roman Empire was simple:paid a subsistence wage, remarkably below
they had none. Well, there were some lawswhat they deserve to be paid. In "Demands of
dictating action to be done to slaves,the Communist Manifesto," Marx wrote that one
certain protection measures, but beyond that,of the first conditions of a just government
they were as much slaves as Africans were foris this: that child labor is immediately
centuries in America. The rights of serfs ineradicated, and that an education is provided
the Feudal times were much evolved from thatfor them.More simply put... Those who
of slavery. A serf worked, and a great dealproduce everything are given almost nothing.
of his produce went to his master. A serfThis is not justice. Capitalism has nearly
was not allowed to leave his land withoutreproduced Feudalism, in such a manner that
consent. Finally, we have Capitalism, orFeudalism nearly reproduced slavery. No
Free Enterprise, the system where a workerhumane heart can look at these children,
can leave his land whenever he wants. But,growing deformed because they work for their
is it real freedom, or is it just thefood, and say, "Ah, liberty! What a great
manifestation of slavery in another form?Thegodsend we have before us!" No kind person
Brutal Nature of CapitalismIn Feudalism,can see the mass of workers, without hope,
there were various classes, but two distinctwithout heart, without meaning, working only
ones: nobility and serfdom. The nobles didthat they may feed themselves and pay their
no manual labor yet they lavished in therent. And where does their money go when
wealth produced by peasants. In Capitalism,they buy food or when they pay their rent?
we see again the rise of two distinctIt goes directly back into the pockets of
classes: the Bourgeoise and the Proletariat.those who exploited them. Perpetual poverty.
The Bourgoise are the capital-owning class,I detest Capitalism because of its inherent
those who own the means of production. Theybrutality. I am not alone.In his "The
own the farms, the banks, the factories. TheCapitalist System," Bakunin wrote, "Thus the
Proletariat, however, own nothing. They haveworker's liberty, so much exalted by the
no farm land. They have no factories. Theyeconomists, jurists, and bourgeois
do not even have food for themselves. Inrepublicans, is only a theoretical freedom,
essense, slavery is entirely recreated.lacking any means for its possible
Because, while a worker can refuse one job orrealization, and consequently it is only a
move from his land, he is entirely dependentfictitious liberty, an utter falsehood. The
upon the Bourgeoise class for providing himtruth is that the whole life of the worker is
with his subsistence.Peter Kropotkin oncesimply a continuous and dismaying succession
wrote of the workers, "We are perfectly awareof terms of serfdom -voluntary from the
that they often work for even less, but wejuridical point of view but compulsory in the
know also that they do it entirely because,economic sense - broken up by momentarily
thanks to to our splendid socialbrief interludes of freedom accompanied by
organization, they would die of hungerstarvation; in other words, it is real
without these ridiculous wages." ["The Wageslavery." Thomas Paine argued against
System," by Peter Kropotkin.] MikhailCapitalism, writing, "It is not charity but a
Bakunin once wrote, "Suppose I am your workerright, not bounty but justice, that I am
and you are my employer. If I offer my laborpleading for. The present state of
at the lowest price, if I consent to have youcivilization is as odious as it is unjust. It
live off my labor, it is certainly notis absolutely the opposite of what it should
because of devotion or brotherly love forbe, and it is necessary that a revolution
you. And no bourgeois economist would dare toshould be made in it. The contrast of
say that it was, however idyllic and naiveaffluence and wretchedness continually
their reasoning becomes when they begin tomeeting and offending the eye, is like dead
speak about reciprocal affections and mutualand living bodies chained together."
relations which should exist between["Agrarian Justice," by Thomas Paine.] In
employers and employees. No, I do it becausethe same work, he wrote, "The state of
my family and I would starve to death if Icivilization that has prevailed throughout
did not work for an employer. Thus I amEurope, is as unjust in its principle, as it
forced to sell you my labor at the lowestis horrid in its effects; and it is the
possible price, and I am forced to do it byconsciousness of this, and the apprehension
the threat of hunger." ["The Capitalistthat such a state cannot continue when once
System," by Mikhail Bakunin.] In that sameinvestigation begins in any country, that
document, he also wrote, "The worker is inmakes the possessors of property dread every
the position of a serf because this terribleidea of a revolution." As Henry Salt once
threat of starvation which daily hangs overwrote, "Our capitalists persist to the bitter
his head and over his family, will force himend in the fatuous assertion that to live
to accept any conditions imposed by theidly on the labour of others is not the same
gainful calculations of the capitalist, thething as to steal." ["Thou Shalt Not Steal,"
industrialist, the employer." Robert Greenby Henry Stephens Shakespeare Salt, Justice,
Ingersoll once wrote, "The working peopleMarch 14, 1885.]What is it that we have
should be protected by law; if they are not,before us? Great injustice, brutality,
the capitalists will require just as manycruelty, misery, and vice. I believe that
hours as human nature can bear." ["Eightevery worker should be paid the wealth they
Hours Must Come," by Robert Greenproduce. I believe that those who own
Ingersoll.]Workers have no property, so theycapital should be relinquished of their
cannot bargain. They cannot demand higherrights to the means of production. Did
wages, for while they do, their children areHarriet Tubman ever leave money behind, to
shouting for bread that does not exist. Thatcompensate the slave-owner? Certainly not!
is the result of Capitalism. A CapitalistThe idea of it is an absurdity. So, then,
philosopher may speak of "freedom" ortoo, the Capitalist class should have its
"liberty" all he wants. But when it comesright to the means of production released.
down to it, it's th politics of starving. ItBecause, as they own the means of production,
is perpetual poverty. A person can argue allas they own the farms, they are then granted
they want, "If the job is unfair, they canthe economic right of exploitation, which is
quit and find another one." But as they areopposed ot all good creeds. That is the
thrown back into the job market, they willfirst step to revolution. A law ought to be
rarely be able to find another boss willingmade... stating that no person may become
to pay more.What is it that makes thiswealthy from the labor of another. Everyone
sickening, revolting, and cruel, to the sightshould have an equal obligation to work.
of every humane person? It is that theUpon this commencement, I believe the idea of
workers are responsible for producing theWelfare ought to also be abolished, or at
wealth! Adam Smith wrote, "It was not byleast extremely minimalized. Once workers
gold or by silver, but by labour, that allare being paid what they produce, no person
the wealth of the world was originallywill ever need a handout. Imagine, for
purchased." ["Wealth of Nations", by Adaminstance, if instead of 2.5%, a person was
Smith, Book 1, Chapter 5.] Ingersoll wrote,paid closer to 90% or 95%. Imagine every
"The great body of the people make all thewage multiplied by forty. What you have,
money; do all the work. They plow the land,then, is that corporate profits, instead of
cut down the forests; they produce everythinggoing to the idle, go to the industrious.
that is produced. Then who shall say whatThat is justice. Since working one hour will
shall be done with what is produced exceptbe able to get someone enough subsistence for
the producer?" ["Centennial Oration," bydays, I imagine criminal activity will be
Ingersoll.] In another work, he wrote, "Allgreatly reduced. Why would a robber ever
my sympathies are on the side of those whodecide to steal a TeeVee from someone's home,
toil -- of those who produce the real wealthwhen working one hour would be enough to
of the world -- of those who carry theproduce one or two television sets? Instead
burdens of mankind." ["Eight Hours Mustof having our Capitalists decide for us what
Come," by Ingersoll.] Friedrich Engelsindustries are best, people would
wrote, "Labour is the source of all wealth,Democratically decide for themselves what
the political economists assert. And itthey want. By voting together, every person
really is the source..." ["Part Played bywill have a say in the matter of
Labour in Transition From Ape to Man," bydecision-making. So, then, a new business
Engels, 1876.]The fact that Capitalism incurswill be erected, or an old one destroyed, by
brutality is not at all at question. Robertthe vote of the people. The industries of
Owen, an Industrialist and Utopian Socialistfood, of housing, of luxuries, will all be
of the early 1800's, wrote that in onedetermined by the people. In this regard, we
particular incident, a factory owner hadwill not have the egregious abuse of the
employed children ages 6, 7, and 8. Theyconsumer that we have today under Capitalism.
worked for thirteen hours a day. Their workA person will never go into a tourist shop,
was so grueling and difficult for such tenderand find a molded piece of pottery on sale
bodies, a great deal of them becamefor $40 (though it cost $2 to make), upon
permanently deformed. ["A New View ofwhich any rational person would respond, "We
Society," by Robert Owen, essay 2.] Thomasmade this, while we have starving people in
Malthus also noted the same, "Boys that youthe corners of the globe?"That is Communism,
would guess to be fourteen or fifteen are,and  that  is  what  I  believe  in.  Life,
upon inquiry, frequently found to be eighteen
or nineteen." ["An Essay on the Principle ofPunkerslutPunkerslut (or Andy Carloff) has
Population," by Thomas Malthus.] The factbeen writing essays and poetry on social
that Capitalists have been forcing workers toissues which have caught his attention for
work under harsh conditions is not inseveral years. His website provides a
question by anyone known to the facts. Tocomplete list of all of these writings. His
quote Robert Green Ingersoll, "We have seenlife experience includes homelessness,
here in America street-car drivers workingsquating in New Orleans and LA, dropping out
sixteen and seventeen hours a day. It wasof high school, getting expelled from college
necessary to have a strike in order to get tofor "subversive activities," and a myriad of
fourteen, another strike to get to twelve,other revolutionary actions.
and nobody could blame them for keeping on



1 A B C D E F 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134