The Two Jerusalems

According to the Tanakh, there were twoas 'The Citadel'.
locations called Jerusalem, one inhabited by theThe citadel and sanctuary were constructed in
Amorites (Joshua 10:5), and the other inhabited bythe time of King David and Solomon. Artifacts
the Jebusites (Joshua 15:63; Judges 1:21). One infound within the sanctuary of the citadel mostly
the mountains (Joshua 10:6) and the otherspoke concerning offerings of oil, wine, wheat, and
surrounded by mountains (Psalm 125:2; Nehemiahetc. brought to there by numerous people from
8:15). One the Children of Israel conquered whennot just David and Solomon's time but throughout
they entered the land of Israel (Judges 1:8) andthe reign of the kings of Judah til the kingdoms
the other was took by King David some 300fall to Babylon. However, in the Persian,
years later (2 Samuel 5:7; 1 Chronicles 11:5). One inMaccabean, Roman, and early Mohammadean eras
the mount of Ephraim (Genesis 33:18; Genesislocals continued to transport these items to the
14:18; Joshua 18:1; Judges 4:5;) and the other justsacred precinct of the upper hill. Markers of this
north of Rimmon which is in the southern part ofancient Israelite service remain til this day from
Judah (and the inheritance of Simeon- Joshuabroken pottery litered upon the entire site.
19:7-8) (Zechariah 14:10; Joshua 15:21-32).During the reign of the kings of Judah the citadel
Therefore, reasonably two questions come towas periodically refortified, remodeled and rebuilt
mind: Which one is the modern city Jerusalemupon one another a number of times, until
that we all know? And where is the otherultimately it was destroyed between 597 BCE and
Jerusalem?577 BCE whilst Jerusalem was under siege from
Modern Jerusalem's name is well known to meanthe Babylonian Nebuchadnezzar. Among the most
Salem that was the place of King Melechzedek,fascinating artifacts unearthed from this time are
and was written to be in the mountain of Ephraim.ostraca from the mid-7th century BCE that
Jerusalem is located in some of the highestrefered to this citadel as the House of Yahweh.
mountains in the region (on the top, notHabitation of Tel Arad and the upper citadel did
surrounded by mountains) and is also just next tonot end with the Babylonians. In fact, during the
Bethel. The mountains from the site of Shechem,Persian period (5th - 4th centuries BCE) almost a
Bethel, and modern Jerusalem are all on the samehundred ostracon and pottery were written in
mountain range that streach from Shimron northAramaic and were mostly accounts of locals that
to Har Hebron south. Just considering thebrought oil, wine, wheat, and etc to the upper hill.
geographic clues I would conclude that ModernThus, several citadels were built upon one another
Jerusalem is the Jerusalem of King Adoni-zedekand existed in the Hellenistic and Roman periods.
the Amorite that Joshua fought against andHerod even reconstructed the lower city for the
chased to Makkedah (also not far from modernpurpose of making bread.
Jerusalem).The Jewish historian Flavius Josephus in the first
However, if this is the Amorite Jerusalem thencentury wrote an almost perfect geographic
where is the Jebusite one? It was this Jerusalemdescription that fits Tel Arad and also gave a
that David came to and took a fortress that wasmatching explaination of why the citadel dealt with
built there on mount Zion. And this place he setso much food and supplies in pottery. As stated in
up his own tabernacle to place the Ark within thethe 'Wars of the Jews' 5:1: ".. The city was built
citadel. This place was a House of Yahweh andupon two hills which are opposite to one another,
the city of David fortified by Solomon and otherand have a valley to divide them asunder; at
kings of Judah (2 Samuel 5:9; 2 Chronicles 8:11; 1which valley the corresponding rows of houses on
Kings 9:24; 1 Kings 11:27; 2 Chronicles 32:5), butboth hills end. Of these hills, that which contains
wasn't the Temple built by Solomon on Mountthe upper city is much higher, and in length more
Moriah (2 Chronicles 3:1). Today there is only onedirect. Accordingly, it was called the "Citadel," by
place that has been found and proven to be aking David; he was the father of that Solomon
House of Yahweh in Israel.who built this temple at the first; but it is by us
Tel Arad (Hebrew: תלcalled the "Upper Market-place." But the other hill,
¬Ã‚Ž) (not to be confused with biblical Arad) iswhich was called "Acra," and sustains the lower
located west of the Dead Sea, about 10km westcity, is of the shape of a moon when she is
of modern Arad in an area surrounded byhorned; over-against this was a third hill, but
mountain ridges which is known as the Aradnaturally lower than Acra, and parted formerly
Becken. The Arad area is north of the old andfrom the other by a broad valley."
modern place of Mizpe Rimmon The site is dividedThe site lasted til the Romans destroyed
into a lower city and an upper hill which holds theJerusalem and completely expelled the
only ever discovered 'House of Yahweh' in the'circumcised' in 135 AD.
land of Israel.Archaeology has already substanciated that Tel
The House of Yahweh upon the hill of Tel AradArad existed and was inhabited at the time that
even after over 40 years has sparked a numberJosephus would have wrote this. However, this
of questions with many trying to understand whydescription of the citadel of David could only be
the site has a sanctuary, holy of holies that wereon mount Zion and only in Jerusalem. Yet, one
built in time of the two greatest kings of Judah.fact that is rarely spoken of directly in the
Why does it have records of well known priestlyTanakh is that there were two Jerusalems.
families, and countless amounts of offerings andWith such clear cut differences between the two
pottery from the time of its establishment in KingJerusalems the possibility that the House of
David's time to the Roman and Islamic Empires.Yahweh at 'Tel Arad' is the Citadel of David, the
One conclusion many are beginning to come to isArad Becken is the Jerusalem surrounded by
that this is the tabernacle of David (1 Chroniclesmountains, and not too far north from Mizpe
6:32; Isaiah 16:5; Amos 9:11), the hill of Zion, andRimmon does not stray too far from logic.
area of the Jerusalem of the Jebusites. AndNevertheless, time will tell whether clear proof will
although it might seem unbelievable the evidencecome to the light on the issue.
behind the theory is beginning to have allot ofFor more developments on this I suggest you
weight.search 'House of Yahweh' or 'Tel Arad' on
In the 11th century BCE (the time of Samuel, SaulWikipedia and read these two pages Citadel
and David), initially the upper hill was an unwalledHistory, Zion Search from people presently on the
piece of land cut off as an official or sacredsite.
domain, and then later as a garrison-town known